Quote:
Originally Posted by gm9
Don't think so, was using the target_previous trick long enough without this ever happening as far as I was aware. If you are already targeting x, then /target x, both your current and your previous targets are x.
|
It used to work that way, but a GU or so ago they 'fixed' it so that target_previous gives you a distinct previous target (meaning it will always be different; changing to the same target is ignored for the purposes of target_previous now).